Intelligence requirement and lawful purpose
Define the protected assets, threat questions, lawful purpose, source classes, exclusions, retention and decision thresholds.
Open-source intelligence
Lawful intelligence. Decision-quality evidence.
Purpose-led OSINT for exposed assets, impersonation, fraud signals and digital risk—using lawful sources, provenance and human corroboration.
Request a scoping call
Useful intelligence retains purpose, source provenance, confidence and a lawful escalation route.
Who this helps
Built around a buying situation.
- Security, fraud and risk owners
- Organisations exposed to impersonation or brand abuse
- Decision makers needing lawful digital exposure intelligence
Useful when
The trigger is already visible.
- Internet-facing assets and identities are not fully mapped
- Impersonation or suspicious digital signals need corroboration
- Open-source findings lack provenance, confidence or a lawful escalation route
The position
Collect less. Corroborate better. Act lawfully.
Pegasus begins with an authorised intelligence requirement and a defined decision. Collection is limited to relevant, lawfully accessible sources; findings retain provenance, confidence and limitations; and personal information is handled against an identified lawful purpose rather than gathered simply because it is public.
01
A defined scope and accountable decision owners
02
Controls matched to the real operating context
03
Evidence that can be reviewed, tested and improved
Scope
What the work includes.
Every engagement is scoped around authority, operating context, available evidence and the decision that must be made.
Collection, corroboration and provenance
Map digital exposure and collect relevant signals with source provenance, timestamping, confidence assessment and human corroboration.
Risk-led reporting and escalation
Translate evidence into proportionate technical, platform, legal, reporting or monitoring actions owned by named decision makers.
Method
A controlled route from exposure to evidence.
Decision points, responsibilities and verification stay visible from the start.
Discover
Define the exposure, context, evidence, owners and decision that matters.
Design
Select proportionate controls and make responsibilities and hold points visible.
Implement
Embed the agreed system into the real operating workflow.
Verify
Test whether controls work and whether the evidence supports the conclusion.
Improve
Close actions, learn from exceptions and strengthen the system over time.
Outputs
Evidence designed for use.
Defined intelligence requirement and collection boundary
Digital exposure and relationship map
Source, confidence and evidence register
Prioritised escalation and control recommendations
Professional boundaries
Precision includes saying what the work does not claim.
- Pegasus does not use OSINT as a pretext for unauthorised access, doxxing, harassment or covert intrusion.
- Personal-data processing, monitoring frequency and any external action require an identified lawful basis, authority and proportionate scope.
Questions answered
Before you scope the work.
Does public information have no privacy restrictions?
No. Public availability does not remove data-protection, confidentiality, necessity or proportionality considerations. Purpose and handling are scoped before collection.
Will Pegasus contact a suspected actor?
Not by default. Contact, takedown or investigative escalation needs verified authority, evidence preservation and an agreed legal, platform or law-enforcement route.
Does OSINT include unauthorised access?
No. Pegasus does not bypass access controls, use stolen credentials or disguise intrusion as open-source research.
Authoritative references
External references support context; they do not imply endorsement of Pegasus.
Start the conversation
Bring the exposure. Leave with a controlled route forward.
A first conversation is used to understand context, authority and the decision required—not to force a predetermined package.
Request a scoping call