AI context and inventory
Define organisational context, interested parties, AI-system inventory, scope, roles and governance objectives.
ISO/IEC 42001
Readiness, implementation and internal assurance for accountable AI governance.
Discuss ISO supportWho this helps
Useful when
The position
ISO/IEC 42001 is a management-system framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving responsible AI governance. Pegasus translates that framework into an inventory, roles, lifecycle controls, risk decisions and evidence matched to how the organisation develops, provides or uses AI.
A defined scope and accountable decision owners
Controls matched to the real operating context
Evidence that can be reviewed, tested and improved
Scope
Every engagement is scoped around authority, operating context, available evidence and the decision that must be made.
Define organisational context, interested parties, AI-system inventory, scope, roles and governance objectives.
Build proportionate policy, risk, impact, lifecycle, supplier, data, competence and monitoring controls.
Test implementation through internal audit, management review and a prioritised readiness plan before independent assessment.
Method
Decision points, responsibilities and verification stay visible from the start.
Define the exposure, context, evidence, owners and decision that matters.
Select proportionate controls and make responsibilities and hold points visible.
Embed the agreed system into the real operating workflow.
Test whether controls work and whether the evidence supports the conclusion.
Close actions, learn from exceptions and strengthen the system over time.
Outputs
Scope and evidence map
Prioritised findings and action ownership
Practical control or implementation pack
Verification record and next-step roadmap
Professional boundaries
Questions answered
No. Pegasus provides consultancy, implementation and internal-assurance support. Accredited certification is a separate decision made by an independent certification body.
No. It can apply to organisations that develop, provide or use AI systems. The management-system scope and controls must reflect the organisation's actual role.
Yes. Their management-system structures can be aligned, while retaining the distinct risks, controls and evidence each discipline requires.
Authoritative references
External references support context; they do not imply endorsement of Pegasus.
Start the conversation
A first conversation is used to understand context, authority and the decision required—not to force a predetermined package.
Discuss ISO support